1: Clarence Thomas, Supreme Court Justice, views judicial activism as detrimental to the rule of law.

2: Thomas believes in interpreting the Constitution as written, without injecting personal beliefs.

3: He prioritizes the original intent of the Founding Fathers in his judicial decisions.

4: The Justice is critical of judges who stray from their role as interpreters of the law.

5: Thomas's opinions are rooted in a strict constructionist approach to constitutional interpretation.

6: His dissenting opinions often challenge the prevailing narrative of judicial activism.

7: Thomas advocates for limited government intervention in personal rights and liberties.

8: The Justice values the separation of powers and checks and balances within government.

9: In conclusion, Clarence Thomas's views on judicial activism reflect his commitment to upholding the rule of law.